BMR Calculator: Mifflin-St Jeor, Harris-Benedict, Katch-McArdle & TDEE Guide
What is Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)?
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) is the minimum number of calories your body requires at complete rest — fasted, supine, and in a thermoneutral environment — to sustain life-critical functions. These include cardiac output, respiration, thermoregulation, brain activity, and organ maintenance.
BMR typically accounts for 60–70% of Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE). It is the foundation of evidence-based nutrition planning — without an accurate BMR, calorie targets for fat loss or muscle gain are little better than guesses.
Clinically, BMR is measured via indirect calorimetry (oxygen consumption). In practice, it is estimated using validated predictive equations. This calculator implements the three most widely cited: Mifflin-St Jeor (1990), Harris-Benedict Revised (1984), and Katch-McArdle (1996).
The 3 BMR Formulas Explained
Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) — Current Gold Standard
Female: BMR = 10×W(kg) + 6.25×H(cm) − 5×Age − 161
Validated against 498 subjects via indirect calorimetry. Recommended by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) and ACSM as the most accurate general equation for adults. Error: typically ±10% of measured RMR.
Harris-Benedict Revised (Roza & Shizgal 1984) — Clinical Standard
Female: BMR = 447.593 + 9.247×W + 3.098×H − 4.330×Age
The original 1919 Harris-Benedict formula revised by Roza & Shizgal using 337 subjects. Remains the standard in WHO technical reports and clinical pharmacokinetics. Slightly overestimates BMR in obese individuals.
Katch-McArdle (1996) — Best for Known Body Composition
Uses lean body mass (LBM) directly, eliminating the weight/height/sex proxies. This is the most accurate formula for athletes and individuals with a measured body fat %. It is body-composition neutral — it does not assume a "typical" fat-to-lean ratio. Best paired with DXA-measured body fat %.
6 Calculator Modes Explained
- Mifflin-St Jeor BMR — 4 fields (weight, height, age, sex). The AND/ACSM gold standard for general adults. Outputs BMR, BMI, sedentary TDEE, and moderate TDEE.
- Harris-Benedict BMR — 4 fields (weight, height, age, sex). The WHO/clinical-research standard. Same outputs as Mifflin for direct comparison.
- Katch-McArdle BMR — 3 fields (weight, body fat %, sex). LBM-based formula — most accurate for athletes. Outputs BMR, lean mass, fat mass, sedentary TDEE.
- TDEE Estimator — 5 fields (weight, height, age, sex, activity level). TDEE = BMR × WHO/FAO PAL multiplier. Shows all 5 activity levels simultaneously for comparison.
- Calorie Goal Planner — 6 fields (all TDEE fields + goal type). Sets evidence-based calorie targets for fat loss, maintenance, or lean gain. Outputs target calories, projected weekly change, and 30/40/30 P/C/F macro split.
- Formula Comparison — 5 fields (weight, height, age, sex, body fat %). All 3 formulas computed simultaneously. Consensus average and formula spread shown — spread <50 kcal = high agreement; >100 kcal = atypical body composition.
AdvertisementShow
TDEE & Physical Activity Level (PAL) Multipliers
TDEE = BMR × PAL, where PAL (Physical Activity Level) is defined by WHO/FAO/UNU 2004:
| Activity Level | PAL | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sedentary | ×1.2 | Desk job, little/no exercise |
| Lightly Active | ×1.375 | Exercise 1–3 days/week |
| Moderately Active | ×1.55 | Exercise 3–5 days/week |
| Very Active | ×1.725 | Hard exercise 6–7 days/week |
| Extra Active | ×1.9 | Physical job + daily training |
Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT) — fidgeting, standing, walking — accounts for 200–800 kcal/day variation between individuals. Accurate activity classification is the most important variable after BMR itself.
Calorie Goals & Macros (Evidence-Based)
| Goal | Adjustment | Projected Change |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive Loss | −1,100 kcal/day | −1 kg/week |
| Moderate Loss | −550 kcal/day | −0.5 kg/week |
| Maintain Weight | 0 kcal | Stable |
| Lean Gain | +275 kcal/day | +0.25 kg/week |
| Bulk | +550 kcal/day | +0.5 kg/week |
1 kg of body fat ≈ 7,700 kcal. The macro split used (30% protein / 40% carbs / 30% fat) follows ACSM 2016 evidence-based guidelines. During fat loss, protein should be increased to ≥1.6–2.2 g/kg body weight to minimise lean mass catabolism (Phillips & Van Loon 2011).
Average BMR by Age & Sex (Mifflin-St Jeor)
| Age Group | Male Avg (kcal/day) | Female Avg (kcal/day) |
|---|---|---|
| 18–29 | 1,890 | 1,490 |
| 30–39 | 1,840 | 1,440 |
| 40–49 | 1,790 | 1,390 |
| 50–59 | 1,740 | 1,340 |
| 60–69 | 1,650 | 1,270 |
| 70+ | 1,560 | 1,200 |
Based on Mifflin-St Jeor using reference body sizes: 70 kg male (175 cm) / 60 kg female (163 cm). Individual BMR varies with actual body composition — athletes typically have BMR 10–20% above these averages.
FAQs
Is BMR the same as RMR?
BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate) and RMR (Resting Metabolic Rate) are similar but not identical. BMR is measured under strict conditions — fasted 12+ hours, supine rest, thermoneutral environment. RMR is measured under less strict conditions (3+ hours fasted, rested). RMR is typically 10–20% higher than true BMR. All three equations in this calculator technically predict RMR under common usage, though they are labelled BMR in clinical literature.
Why does formula spread matter?
The three formulas were calibrated on "average" adult populations. If your body composition is atypical — very high or low BMI, very athletic, or very old — the formulas diverge significantly (spread >100 kcal). This divergence is itself diagnostic: it indicates that no single formula is reliable for your body type, and a DEXA scan with Katch-McArdle is the most accurate path forward. Spread <50 kcal = high formula agreement = you fall within the calibration range.
How often should I recalculate my BMR?
Recalculate whenever your weight changes by ±2–3 kg, or every 4–8 weeks during active diet phases. BMR changes with body weight — losing fat reduces BMR slightly; gaining muscle increases it. After significant weight loss (>10% body weight), metabolic adaptation may cause actual BMR to fall 5–15% below formula predictions — this is a known limitation of predictive equations called "metabolic adaptation" or the "Minnesota Starvation Experiment effect."